New Posts For Thread: What ifhttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_ifCashman had pulled off a deal getting King Felix and the same thing happened to him as Pineda. Would he be taking the ridiculous flack he's getting that it was a bad deal? Just curious.If Pineda doesn't work out, the Yanks got even less than a rental.http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519233845#519233845If Pineda doesn't work out, the Yanks got even less than a rental.Tue, 01 May 2012 18:17:24 -0500I wasnt even totally for the pineda deal because i felt the yanks needed montero's bat more than a pitcher at that timehttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519229115#519229115I wasnt even totally for the pineda deal because i felt the yanks needed montero's bat more than a pitcher at that timeTue, 01 May 2012 15:42:57 -0500That's why I hated that deal. We all knew it was a rental, and Lee confirmed it by basically saying he never wanted to pitch here. Not hard to believe he would have hopped the next plane out of town as soon as the season was over.[/quote] More to thehttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519228675#519228675That's why I hated that deal. We all knew it was a rental, and Lee confirmed it by basically saying he never wanted to pitch here. Not hard to believe he would have hopped the next plane out of town as soon as the season was over.[/quote] More to theTue, 01 May 2012 15:29:18 -0500That's why I hated that deal. We all knew it was a rental, and Lee confirmed it by basically saying he never wanted to pitch here. Not hard to believe he would have hopped the next plane out of town as soon as the season was over.http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227841#519227841That's why I hated that deal. We all knew it was a rental, and Lee confirmed it by basically saying he never wanted to pitch here. Not hard to believe he would have hopped the next plane out of town as soon as the season was over.Tue, 01 May 2012 15:07:19 -0500Why would trading for Santana have been a bad thing?[/quote]Ask the Mets what they think of paying $137M for 6 years of a guy past his prime and battling injuries over the last couple of years. [/quote]In his first 3 years with the Mets he was 40-2http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227507#519227507Why would trading for Santana have been a bad thing?[/quote]Ask the Mets what they think of paying $137M for 6 years of a guy past his prime and battling injuries over the last couple of years. [/quote]In his first 3 years with the Mets he was 40-2Tue, 01 May 2012 14:59:24 -0500i read somewhere that the yanks were working on an extension for Lee before the trade was approved . either way i wouldnt have wanted to trade montero for a rentalhttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227397#519227397i read somewhere that the yanks were working on an extension for Lee before the trade was approved . either way i wouldnt have wanted to trade montero for a rentalTue, 01 May 2012 14:56:17 -0500He had 3 good years with the Mets, not just one. Hughes and Chamberlain are still struggling and have had a bunch of injuries as well, and Melky got traded anyway. I don't know where this idea that Santana was showing signs of decline. He still had ahttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227299#519227299He had 3 good years with the Mets, not just one. Hughes and Chamberlain are still struggling and have had a bunch of injuries as well, and Melky got traded anyway. I don't know where this idea that Santana was showing signs of decline. He still had aTue, 01 May 2012 14:53:35 -0500Why would trading for Santana have been a bad thing?[/quote]Ask the Mets what they think of paying $137M for 6 years of a guy past his prime and battling injuries over the last couple of years. [/quote]In his first 3 years with the Mets he was 40-2http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227267#519227267Why would trading for Santana have been a bad thing?[/quote]Ask the Mets what they think of paying $137M for 6 years of a guy past his prime and battling injuries over the last couple of years. [/quote]In his first 3 years with the Mets he was 40-2Tue, 01 May 2012 14:52:52 -0500He had 3 good years with the Mets, not just one. Hughes and Chamberlain are still struggling and have had a bunch of injuries as well, and Melky got traded anyway. I don't know where this idea that Santana was showing signs of decline. He still had ahttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227247#519227247He had 3 good years with the Mets, not just one. Hughes and Chamberlain are still struggling and have had a bunch of injuries as well, and Melky got traded anyway. I don't know where this idea that Santana was showing signs of decline. He still had aTue, 01 May 2012 14:52:10 -0500He had 3 good years with the Mets, not just one. Hughes and Chamberlain are still struggling and have had a bunch of injuries as well, and Melky got traded anyway. I don't know where this idea that Santana was showing signs of decline. He still had ahttp://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29092249/What_if?post_id=519227167#519227167He had 3 good years with the Mets, not just one. Hughes and Chamberlain are still struggling and have had a bunch of injuries as well, and Melky got traded anyway. I don't know where this idea that Santana was showing signs of decline. He still had aTue, 01 May 2012 14:49:45 -0500