<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: for all you Donnie baseball fans ..</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..</link><description>nice article in todays Daily News .. in Bill Madden's column ..re: Don Mattingly and the great job he is doing  ...</description><item><title>He's already in.</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520703355#520703355</link><description>He's already in.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:51:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sutton may not get in, but his Perm is worthy of having it's own Wing in Cooperstown</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520703305#520703305</link><description>Sutton may not get in, but his Perm is worthy of having it's own Wing in Cooperstown</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:50:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not a Sutton fan either (the Dodgers are lower than the Red Sox to me) but this guy had a remarkable career. At the age of 41 he still won 15 games in 1986. He had an ERA under 3.00 8 times and only had an ERA over 4.00 3 times. He pitched over 2</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520702863#520702863</link><description>I'm not a Sutton fan either (the Dodgers are lower than the Red Sox to me) but this guy had a remarkable career. At the age of 41 he still won 15 games in 1986. He had an ERA under 3.00 8 times and only had an ERA over 4.00 3 times. He pitched over 2</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:38:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not a Sutton fan either (the Dodgers are lower than the Red Sox to me) but this guy had a remarkable career. At the age of 41 he still won 15 games in 1986. He had an ERA under 3.00 8 times and only had an ERA over 4.00 3 times. He pitched over 2</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520701155#520701155</link><description>I'm not a Sutton fan either (the Dodgers are lower than the Red Sox to me) but this guy had a remarkable career. At the age of 41 he still won 15 games in 1986. He had an ERA under 3.00 8 times and only had an ERA over 4.00 3 times. He pitched over 2</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:53:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not a Sutton fan either (the Dodgers are lower than the Red Sox to me) but this guy had a remarkable career. At the age of 41 he still won 15 games in 1986. He had an ERA under 3.00 8 times and only had an ERA over 4.00 3 times. He pitched over 2</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520695201#520695201</link><description>I'm not a Sutton fan either (the Dodgers are lower than the Red Sox to me) but this guy had a remarkable career. At the age of 41 he still won 15 games in 1986. He had an ERA under 3.00 8 times and only had an ERA over 4.00 3 times. He pitched over 2</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:33:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>donnie is the greatest.</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520690983#520690983</link><description>donnie is the greatest.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:56:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>understandable ..i think he never gave me the impression he was dominant either ..i was surprised he won that many i thought he had around 305.. or so ... i was curious thanks for your explanation Bomber ..</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520687377#520687377</link><description>understandable ..i think he never gave me the impression he was dominant either ..i was surprised he won that many i thought he had around 305.. or so ... i was curious thanks for your explanation Bomber ..</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:35:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Baron, I have nothing against Sutton (except him being a 70s Dodger). I just never thought of Sutton as great. I always thought there were much better pitchers during his time.</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520687059#520687059</link><description>Baron, I have nothing against Sutton (except him being a 70s Dodger). I just never thought of Sutton as great. I always thought there were much better pitchers during his time.</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:16:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>bomber ..i take it you dont like Sutton...sometimes the writers who vote for players that are eligable ..take a personal approach on "their vote"... if a player such as Sutton was uncooperative ..it's held against them ....human nature i guess ... Su</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520686003#520686003</link><description>bomber ..i take it you dont like Sutton...sometimes the writers who vote for players that are eligable ..take a personal approach on "their vote"... if a player such as Sutton was uncooperative ..it's held against them ....human nature i guess ... Su</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:20:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Joe/Baron, I agree with you too. For 5/6 years Donnie was unquestionably the best player in the majors. To me HoF is for dominant players which he was, not for longevity, like Sutton.</title><link>http://www.myyesnetwork.com/go/thread/view/82290/29170721/for_all_you_Donnie_baseball_fans_..?post_id=520685361#520685361</link><description>Joe/Baron, I agree with you too. For 5/6 years Donnie was unquestionably the best player in the majors. To me HoF is for dominant players which he was, not for longevity, like Sutton.</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:46:47 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
