YES Network.com

MLB NBA
MLB NBA
 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 6 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Steve Goldman, general mgr
6 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2007 - 11:29AM #51
NevadaYank
Posts: 0

What we have here is some American liberals beaming with glee when something goes bad in Iraq. Personally I care for our soldiers over there more than I care for the Iraq itself and the people that make up its population. so as long as the Muslim fanatics are blowing up a county in the middle east, I could care less. But it sure is to bad that our brave American armed forces has to baby sit a country of homicidal maniacs so they are not let lose on the rest of the world again. something a Democrat never thinks about and the reason 9/11 is never mentioned when Democrats are speaking because if it is brought up it brings up memories of why they voted overwhelmingly for the war on terrorism in the first place. I know Iraq had nothing to do with it but is it not a coincidence that Bush has closed down both Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan from helping world wide terrorism and the amount of outside of the Middle East terror attacks have gone down to almost zero.


Ben writes that the war won the house and senate for the democrats with out mentioning a little thing that happened on the way to the last elections, Oil prices drove fuel prices to over $3 a gallon three seperate times over the past two years for the first time in Americas history. Do you have any idea the impact that had on the American people and the cost of goods in this country. The Oil companies and speculators made a fortune on the American people, and I would not be surprised that both Democrats and Republicans where eating at that hogs troth of riches while our soldiers fought to keep terrorist from blowing jet planes out of the air and turning New York sky scrapers into rubble.


The most amazing part is the same Democratic liberals that spit in the faces of American soldiers coming home from Vietnam are basically the rabble rousers that pretend to have so much compassion for the latest breed of volunteers soldier. I believe Democrats to be the biggest two face bunch of cry babies that have ever lead this nation in times of war. Make no mistake we are at war for the Holy land of Oil and Democrats better wise up because one day when you are kowtowing to Al-Qaeda like the rest of Europe is you will not have a guy like Bush someone that is hated by many, but kept us safe and sound at night here in this country since 9/11


That is how Bush will be remembered history wise, a guy that had to do the unpleasant job because the Democrat that preceded him wanted to be loved and while he was receiving his daily BJ he determined that Al-Qaeda was not a threat to be dealt with. I just wonder who will be the next terrorist that Democrat pronounce to be a non threat to America? Well lets see they named Arafat gave him a Man of the Year Award then of course there was Ben laden himself a guy that was not worth the effort to go after to pick him up when he was offered to Clinton.

6 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2007 - 11:29AM #52
NevadaYank
Posts: 0

What we have here is some American liberals beaming with glee when something goes bad in Iraq. Personally I care for our soldiers over there more than I care for the Iraq itself and the people that make up its population. so as long as the Muslim fanatics are blowing up a county in the middle east, I could care less. But it sure is to bad that our brave American armed forces has to baby sit a country of homicidal maniacs so they are not let lose on the rest of the world again. something a Democrat never thinks about and the reason 9/11 is never mentioned when Democrats are speaking because if it is brought up it brings up memories of why they voted overwhelmingly for the war on terrorism in the first place. I know Iraq had nothing to do with it but is it not a coincidence that Bush has closed down both Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan from helping world wide terrorism and the amount of outside of the Middle East terror attacks have gone down to almost zero.


Ben writes that the war won the house and senate for the democrats with out mentioning a little thing that happened on the way to the last elections, Oil prices drove fuel prices to over $3 a gallon three seperate times over the past two years for the first time in Americas history. Do you have any idea the impact that had on the American people and the cost of goods in this country. The Oil companies and speculators made a fortune on the American people, and I would not be surprised that both Democrats and Republicans where eating at that hogs troth of riches while our soldiers fought to keep terrorist from blowing jet planes out of the air and turning New York sky scrapers into rubble.


The most amazing part is the same Democratic liberals that spit in the faces of American soldiers coming home from Vietnam are basically the rabble rousers that pretend to have so much compassion for the latest breed of volunteers soldier. I believe Democrats to be the biggest two face bunch of cry babies that have ever lead this nation in times of war. Make no mistake we are at war for the Holy land of Oil and Democrats better wise up because one day when you are kowtowing to Al-Qaeda like the rest of Europe is you will not have a guy like Bush someone that is hated by many, but kept us safe and sound at night here in this country since 9/11


That is how Bush will be remembered history wise, a guy that had to do the unpleasant job because the Democrat that preceded him wanted to be loved and while he was receiving his daily BJ he determined that Al-Qaeda was not a threat to be dealt with. I just wonder who will be the next terrorist that Democrat pronounce to be a non threat to America? Well lets see they named Arafat gave him a Man of the Year Award then of course there was Ben laden himself a guy that was not worth the effort to go after to pick him up when he was offered to Clinton.

6 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2007 - 3:58PM #53
tajt
Posts: 0

You can spin as much as you like, but Iraq presented no threat to the United States. The reason 9/11 doesn't come up more often is because hardly anything has been done about it.

Bush has made America less safe by overextending our military, letting Al Quaeda recover, destablizing a country and the region, and provoking terrorists.

6 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2007 - 3:58PM #54
tajt
Posts: 0

You can spin as much as you like, but Iraq presented no threat to the United States. The reason 9/11 doesn't come up more often is because hardly anything has been done about it.

Bush has made America less safe by overextending our military, letting Al Quaeda recover, destablizing a country and the region, and provoking terrorists.

6 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2007 - 10:10PM #55
NevadaYank
Posts: 0

Perhaps if you spoke in thought instead of talking points I could understand you better. You are saying we are less safe outside of the Middle East then we where in September 2001?


Now let me get this straight terrorist under the Clinton Presidency planned the 9/11 bombing blew up planes coming out of New York and Boston almost monthly and you say we where safe?


For example you do remember the mysterious mid air 747 explosion of the flight going to Paris, that did not ground the whole 747 fleet. Authorities claimed a fuel line problem then a few months after 9/11 a terrorist coming from Paris is captured by passengers trying to light one of his sneakers on fire, his sneaker is found to hold plastic explosives, it is as bomb capable of blowing the jet liner out of the air, official fully understand now what brought down the 747 flight going to Paris. You can go on and on but another example is enough, a Egyptian flight coming out of New York has a terrorist assume co pilot duties and kills or disables his fellow crew members and then proceeds to crash his hijacked airliner into the sea while singing praises to Allah he joy rides his passenger to their death. Now what does that remind you of could it be 9/11 itself. Authorities claim disgruntled employee causes crash. perhaps that day it was insufficient flying lessons that caused the plane to crash into the sea instead of into a sky scraper in a city like New York.


During President Clinton's Presidency we had so many warnings of the of the declaration of war and the skill sets that these so called holy warriors had obtained but all of these omens and proof of skills where explained away with stories of fuel lines or other made up stupidity to keep panic down to a minimum.


Think about it one second the liberals claim they want to protect the country but the minute the Patriot Act was passed they started to complain and denounce it, as if terrorism had been defeated already and Americans should not be inconvenienced by something as mundane as keeping the country safe from the same terrorist that are still at large.


In the Ben's and JCnNJ eyes they may use the democratic talking points of not being safe but in actuality they have declared victory and want to go home and have lunch and let the future take care of itself. this is basically what President Clinton did his whole 8 year term let the future take care of its self. The problem was that the future did not take care of itself and the terrorist struck home, the rest is history and the present and the future of the war on terror and just because you want to go home guys does not mean the Fundamentalist want to do the same.


I can not believe how so many liberal complainers could act as if they have the stomach for defending our country but at the same time fall victim to the Stockholm syndrome in which terrorist held in a Iraqi prison are subject to a little humiliation and it makes media wide liberal press news but a beheading of a prisoner by the terrorist rate a few moments of news time? This is where the war is lost before it begins when liberals care more for the enemy then they do for their own people. As long as we have a liberal media that will supports the doctrine of America is the bad guy in the world, over time we will have 70 to 80 % of Americans not wanting to defend themselves, convinced by the liberal press that it is better to Kowtow to the terrorist as Europe has already to defend ourselves. The problem with the American press is they do not see through the game European leaders are playing, it is one of financial jack pots as the games reward. If they can stir up enough world wide anti Americanism then Europe can sell more products to the rest of the world. It is to bad that Liberals buy into such shallow European positions when it comes to who's continent they honor? It was America that toke on the same task that we find ourselves in in the middle east keeping the piece between to warring factions the Soviets and the Europeans, Check that it was not the Soviets that started all the wars before WW 2 it was the Europeans, so it was Americans sacrificing in Europe to keep Europe from exploding again and causing WW3.


All one needs to do is keep an eye on history and you will see why the USA is not getting the support from Europe that the situation in the middle East deserves. Europe is trying to stretch its muscle once again, could WW3 be to far into the future since it is being aided by the Dogs of War the American liberal press.

6 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2007 - 10:10PM #56
NevadaYank
Posts: 0

Perhaps if you spoke in thought instead of talking points I could understand you better. You are saying we are less safe outside of the Middle East then we where in September 2001?


Now let me get this straight terrorist under the Clinton Presidency planned the 9/11 bombing blew up planes coming out of New York and Boston almost monthly and you say we where safe?


For example you do remember the mysterious mid air 747 explosion of the flight going to Paris, that did not ground the whole 747 fleet. Authorities claimed a fuel line problem then a few months after 9/11 a terrorist coming from Paris is captured by passengers trying to light one of his sneakers on fire, his sneaker is found to hold plastic explosives, it is as bomb capable of blowing the jet liner out of the air, official fully understand now what brought down the 747 flight going to Paris. You can go on and on but another example is enough, a Egyptian flight coming out of New York has a terrorist assume co pilot duties and kills or disables his fellow crew members and then proceeds to crash his hijacked airliner into the sea while singing praises to Allah he joy rides his passenger to their death. Now what does that remind you of could it be 9/11 itself. Authorities claim disgruntled employee causes crash. perhaps that day it was insufficient flying lessons that caused the plane to crash into the sea instead of into a sky scraper in a city like New York.


During President Clinton's Presidency we had so many warnings of the of the declaration of war and the skill sets that these so called holy warriors had obtained but all of these omens and proof of skills where explained away with stories of fuel lines or other made up stupidity to keep panic down to a minimum.


Think about it one second the liberals claim they want to protect the country but the minute the Patriot Act was passed they started to complain and denounce it, as if terrorism had been defeated already and Americans should not be inconvenienced by something as mundane as keeping the country safe from the same terrorist that are still at large.


In the Ben's and JCnNJ eyes they may use the democratic talking points of not being safe but in actuality they have declared victory and want to go home and have lunch and let the future take care of itself. this is basically what President Clinton did his whole 8 year term let the future take care of its self. The problem was that the future did not take care of itself and the terrorist struck home, the rest is history and the present and the future of the war on terror and just because you want to go home guys does not mean the Fundamentalist want to do the same.


I can not believe how so many liberal complainers could act as if they have the stomach for defending our country but at the same time fall victim to the Stockholm syndrome in which terrorist held in a Iraqi prison are subject to a little humiliation and it makes media wide liberal press news but a beheading of a prisoner by the terrorist rate a few moments of news time? This is where the war is lost before it begins when liberals care more for the enemy then they do for their own people. As long as we have a liberal media that will supports the doctrine of America is the bad guy in the world, over time we will have 70 to 80 % of Americans not wanting to defend themselves, convinced by the liberal press that it is better to Kowtow to the terrorist as Europe has already to defend ourselves. The problem with the American press is they do not see through the game European leaders are playing, it is one of financial jack pots as the games reward. If they can stir up enough world wide anti Americanism then Europe can sell more products to the rest of the world. It is to bad that Liberals buy into such shallow European positions when it comes to who's continent they honor? It was America that toke on the same task that we find ourselves in in the middle east keeping the piece between to warring factions the Soviets and the Europeans, Check that it was not the Soviets that started all the wars before WW 2 it was the Europeans, so it was Americans sacrificing in Europe to keep Europe from exploding again and causing WW3.


All one needs to do is keep an eye on history and you will see why the USA is not getting the support from Europe that the situation in the middle East deserves. Europe is trying to stretch its muscle once again, could WW3 be to far into the future since it is being aided by the Dogs of War the American liberal press.

6 years ago  ::  Mar 04, 2007 - 4:08AM #57
Benjamminwithyou
Posts: 0
I was wondering when the 3rd Stooge would show up. Welcome to this convo Nevadayank. I'm quite positive Bush will go down as one of the worst presidents in U.S. history. His whole policy of winning a "war on terror" by creating more terrorists, not to mention lying to the U.S. public to get them into a war which has turned into a sectarian conflict because his inept leadership tried to do it cheaply probably won't be viewed upon well with posterity. Also his environmental policy will probably be criticized heavily, as that figures to be a salient issue in the future.
6 years ago  ::  Mar 04, 2007 - 4:08AM #58
Benjamminwithyou
Posts: 0
I was wondering when the 3rd Stooge would show up. Welcome to this convo Nevadayank. I'm quite positive Bush will go down as one of the worst presidents in U.S. history. His whole policy of winning a "war on terror" by creating more terrorists, not to mention lying to the U.S. public to get them into a war which has turned into a sectarian conflict because his inept leadership tried to do it cheaply probably won't be viewed upon well with posterity. Also his environmental policy will probably be criticized heavily, as that figures to be a salient issue in the future.
6 years ago  ::  Mar 04, 2007 - 4:15AM #59
Benjamminwithyou
Posts: 0
hahaha Europe flexing its muscle? What muscle? We are leagues ahead of them in defense spending as well as will to use our forces. Try again Nevadayank.
6 years ago  ::  Mar 04, 2007 - 4:15AM #60
Benjamminwithyou
Posts: 0
hahaha Europe flexing its muscle? What muscle? We are leagues ahead of them in defense spending as well as will to use our forces. Try again Nevadayank.
Page 6 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum