Admin, please fix the boards. The blank screen problem seems resolved but the upload/download times are looooong.

Apr 9, 2012 -- 5:13PM, T15D23 wrote:

Obama has proven, even with a so-called Harvard degree, of which we have no idea what his grades were, that he can't even man a lemonade stand.

Romney on the other hand, would find ways for the government to subsidize the lemonade stand.

What is a so called Harvard degree? Another unproven lie by you?

Mitt Romney's educational history is well documented and fully available.  Anyone can find that he was at the top of his class at BYU's College of Humanities and was a speaker at his commencement.  At Harvard he was **** laud at the Law School and a Baker Scholar at the Business School.  So I go back to my previous post, it is clear that President Obama's policies are highly influenced by his Harvard Professors.  It would seem to me that there are few people with the credentials that Mitt Romney has as proof that he digested those Professors' instruction to their satisfaction.  Therefore if the point he is trying to make is that their influence is too great in this administration can't we agree that he speaks with some authority?

Apr 11, 2012 -- 1:05PM, MajorYankFan wrote:

Harvard expects that the scholarship and collegiality it fosters in its students will lead them in their later lives to advance knowledge, to promote understanding, and to serve society.

So Obama fulfilled Harvard's expectation and Romney did not.

Clearly Obama is the better person by his decision to help others.

Obama like the vast majority of politicians will have a legacy of doing more harm than good even if we refuse to acknowledge it.  A better person would have used their own ingenuity to provide cheaper or superior goods or services that improve the quality of life of it's customers.  A better person would be charitable with their own amassed wealth rather than pawning off the burden of their generosity on others.  Those better people seldom are appreciated for their contributions and society has dismissed them as so called "robber barons."

Apr 11, 2012 -- 8:33PM, MajorYankFan wrote:

Translation:  The many will suffer so a few corrupt and

amoral criminals masquerading as entrepreneurs can engage

in shady business practices and corrupt the political

process.  This form of economic system rivals fascism as

pure evil.

You are right, Obama and the executives at Boeing, Solyndra, Siemens, et al. are unscrupulous opportunist exploiting the system for person gains while the government should be an impartial law enforcer rather than the biased participant that it is wielded as.

campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/arti...