YES Network.com

Apr 18, 2012 -- 5:41PM, JoeGNJ wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 5:10PM, MADMAX wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 4:42PM, ArtVandelay wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 4:35PM, MADMAX wrote:

 Let everyone who's not in poverty pay their share. That's where the (D's) differ from the (R's). 

they already pay their share - everyone should pay less as we cut useless spending across the board...  braindead libs laugh at hard working guys like Joe as they tell him don't worry, we need to spread your wealth around to the lazy poor...

They will pay their fair share when they pay the same rate. The poor aren't always the lazy. We also have the working poor. 

Solutionsd simple...FLAT TAX. The libs croak at the notion though. It offends their Robin Hood instincts.

I've said it before and can't say it enough. The ultimate, fair compromise would be medicare for all and a flat tax with no loopholes. Those living in poverty can be exempt if need be. Both party's and their voters get what they want. Every American has access to the same services and every American pays the same rate.

Apr 18, 2012 -- 5:49PM, MADMAX wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 5:41PM, JoeGNJ wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 5:10PM, MADMAX wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 4:42PM, ArtVandelay wrote:

Apr 18, 2012 -- 4:35PM, MADMAX wrote:

 Let everyone who's not in poverty pay their share. That's where the (D's) differ from the (R's). 

they already pay their share - everyone should pay less as we cut useless spending across the board...  braindead libs laugh at hard working guys like Joe as they tell him don't worry, we need to spread your wealth around to the lazy poor...

They will pay their fair share when they pay the same rate. The poor aren't always the lazy. We also have the working poor. 

Solutionsd simple...FLAT TAX. The libs croak at the notion though. It offends their Robin Hood instincts.

I've said it before and can't say it enough. The ultimate, fair compromise would be medicare for all and a flat tax with no loopholes. Those living in poverty can be exempt if need be. Both party's and their voters get what they want. Every American has access to the same services and every American pays the same rate.

sounds good to me - 15% on all income, states can tax what they want so if they have high taxes in one place we can move where there is little or no state tax, freedom of choice...  also we need to make the feds live on what they take in, a balanced budget amendment - we can only spend what we take in, like most families operate...  also no wars, if we are attacked we nuke the crap out of someone, no questions asked, so we save billions on defense.  We can still keep a large prepared military because the politicians will need to still have soldiers to pretend to thank for something...  also a no empty bedroom law, Pelosi, Romney, Gates, Buffet and Obama will have to allow homeless people to live in the spare bedrooms in their mansions...

Apr 18, 2012 -- 3:38PM, craner7 wrote:

...I cannot comprehend for one second how any logical thinking person like you(?) supports him. Never ever ever ever...

You answered your own question without knowin' it.

Apr 17, 2012 -- 10:38PM, JoeGNJ wrote:

Apr 17, 2012 -- 10:13PM, Yankee1954 wrote:

Apr 17, 2012 -- 9:14PM, craner7 wrote:

The Lib interviewing Nugent.

It must make all you Righties proud to have a crude, over the hill rocker called the POTUS names like this. but if a pundit says something about Ann Romney, and tells the truth, its just awful. HYPOCRITES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey doooooshie poooh! What did YOU and you libby wibbies call Bush? That was ok....! Ted Nugent stoned and drunk could do a better job as POTUS than the clown we have in there now. In fact, NICK SWISHER IS NO LONGER KNOWN AS BOZO in my book! BHO is Bozo and thats a compliment!

Never anything like this. Of course you whined about the Ann Romney deal last week. You are full of it.