YES Network.com

MLB NBA
MLB NBA
 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 8 of 11  •  Prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Cashman has to be Fired!
1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 1:01PM #71
hall4netls
Posts: 951

This is by far my favorite thread.

GO YANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 1:24PM #72
Lola
Posts: 12,571

Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:27AM, 61in61 wrote:


Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:18AM, laurenfrances wrote:


Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:03AM, 61in61 wrote:


Cashman should be fired. He screwed up.




That's a bit harsh if you ask me.  Certainly trading Montero for an young power arm is reasonable as the need for DH for our Yankees is built in. With what's available most fans at the time thought it was a good trade for both sides.  Unfortunately, presently it didn't pan out for our Yankees.  As with pitchers, higher risk are always involved.  


Like many fans here, I'm also disappointed.  Facts remain Pineda is on the shelf for the coming year.  Time to focus on the season at hand.  No use crying for what we don't have....




He made a mistake. No second chances with something of this magnitude. Cashman has a long track record of signing/trading for lousy pitchers. This should be the last straw.




61.... Are you serious? I can't tell.... Nobody's happy about this situation but c'mon. Everyone on this board was signing Cashman's praises for making that trade. You think Cashman knew Pineda was going to be injured.

1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 3:15PM #73
61in61
Posts: 12,400

Apr 28, 2012 -- 1:24PM, Lola wrote:


Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:27AM, 61in61 wrote:


Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:18AM, laurenfrances wrote:


Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:03AM, 61in61 wrote:


Cashman should be fired. He screwed up.




That's a bit harsh if you ask me.  Certainly trading Montero for an young power arm is reasonable as the need for DH for our Yankees is built in. With what's available most fans at the time thought it was a good trade for both sides.  Unfortunately, presently it didn't pan out for our Yankees.  As with pitchers, higher risk are always involved.  


Like many fans here, I'm also disappointed.  Facts remain Pineda is on the shelf for the coming year.  Time to focus on the season at hand.  No use crying for what we don't have....




He made a mistake. No second chances with something of this magnitude. Cashman has a long track record of signing/trading for lousy pitchers. This should be the last straw.




61.... Are you serious? I can't tell.... Nobody's happy about this situation but c'mon. Everyone on this board was signing Cashman's praises for making that trade. You think Cashman knew Pineda was going to be injured.




Every year since 2002 we have to go through this crap. In 2003 it was Weaver and a bunch of malcontents like Felix Heredia and Armando Benetiz and Juan Aceveda;in 2004 it was Vazquez and Brown and Loiza and Karsay and Nitkowski; in 2005 it was Pavano and Wright and Buddy Groom and Alan Embree and Tim Redding; in 2006 it was Ron Villone, Farnsworth, Dotel, Ponson and Shawn Chacon; in 2007 it was Kei Igawa and Clemens at age 44; in 2008 it was Sidney Ponson again and Darrell Rasner and Latroy Hawkins and Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy.


Andrew Brackman was given a huge deal and had TJ surgery before ever pitching a game for the Yanks. Humberto Sanchez was supposed to be another CC. And then there is Marte and Feliciano.


Cashman has had plenty of chances to put together a starting rotation that didn't have 4 different faces every year.


This a screw up of epic proportions. If you want to call it bad luck then fine. Get somebody that has good luck. If the Godfather sends you on a job you don't come back saying, "I ran into to bad luck."

1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 6:24PM #74
nc01
Posts: 1,146

Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:03AM, 61in61 wrote:


Cashman should be fired. He screwed up.





C'mon man. Anytime you trade for someone or sign a free agent, especially a pitcher, you're taking a chance. At the time, I was stunned that Seattle would trade Pineda.


NC...


 

1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 6:33PM #75
Yankeeloon
Posts: 8,132
I am astounded at the Cashman backers afoot here.  61 just reeled off a nasty list of junk peddlers Cashman brought in here and he didn't even mention Kevin Brown, Vasquez, Wright, Randy Johnson, and every lousy has been or never was to soil this uniform.  Sorry, with Yankee resources, 1 title in 12 years SUCKS.
1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 6:46PM #76
T15D23
Posts: 3,949

Randy Johnson was a lust of King George.


Circumstances around the others...


Kevin Brown was part of a needed overhaul as we lost 3/5 of our rotation in 2003 (Clemens retired, Wells was let go and Pettitte was not offered anything).


Pavano was being chased by everyone and no one expected him to dog his profession the way he did.


Vazquez v1, that as well was a rebuilding of the rotation 2003.


Wright, came off a 15-8, 3.28 ERA season when we got him.


AJ was a head scratcher, mostly for length and amount of contract, but he as well was coming off a career season and in the AL East.


Hughes, Kennedy & Joba were all overhyped.


Hughes, could still perform, but probably needs a location change.


Kennedy had no heart for NY and the NL has treated him well.


Chamberlain, ticking time bomb and a thrower not a starter.


Not everything turns out well, but over the course of the past 10 seasons, we got some contribution out of the above, but not as much as we would all would have liked.


Thankfully, CC is almost 90% there, and Garcia & Colon 2011 were smart moves. Nova is working out. And Pettitte will soon be back.


But pitching in general is an issue for many teams and the pressure to perform in NY appears paralizing to some.


As for Pineda, can't predict this stuff. Montero was a spare part at best as we don't need a DH and he couldn't catch. Lets hope we see a return at some point with Pineda.



Apr 25, 2012 -- 1:00PM, fatgiambi wrote:


his decisions on pitchers have been more than questionable. everyone must admit. 


jaret wright, carl pavano, vasquez, trading for randy johnson, trading kennedy and keeping chamberlain and hughes, not signing darvish, kevin brown, aj burnett. 


ive always like cash's pitching centric and youth focused approach but we have to be honest, our organization's evaluation of pitching is brutal. alot of it does have to do with the fact that it seems pitchers have a much harder time performing here. 





-------------------------
T15D23

- 11/25/03 GBMA

- 6/11/04 GBCJ

- 6/9/07 God Bless Leo

- 10/16/07 God Bless Huck

- 11/12/11 God Bless Mom

-------------------------
1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 6:48PM #77
AJFreeway
Posts: 4,725

Apr 26, 2012 -- 10:38AM, bomberhojoe wrote:


Darvish's salary is $10 million per, but you need to add in another $8.5 million per year for the fee paid to his old club.  So he really cost the Rangers $18.5 million per year.  He may turn out to be worth it, we will see in time.  3/4 starts does not prove anything yet.  As for the Arod deal, I think most if not all agree that was a horrible decision, made by a owner, not a baseball mind in a rash move.  And that move is giving many of us a rash.






Bomber, the important thing to remember is the posting fee for Darvish doesn't count against the team's payroll. that $51 million essentially becomes a moot point when you consider the Steinbrenners make more than that while they are on the crapper.

"I'm an angel in an Earth suit."

1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 7:09PM #78
BigGuy
Posts: 38,017

Apr 28, 2012 -- 6:48PM, AJFreeway wrote:


Apr 26, 2012 -- 10:38AM, bomberhojoe wrote:


Darvish's salary is $10 million per, but you need to add in another $8.5 million per year for the fee paid to his old club.  So he really cost the Rangers $18.5 million per year.  He may turn out to be worth it, we will see in time.  3/4 starts does not prove anything yet.  As for the Arod deal, I think most if not all agree that was a horrible decision, made by a owner, not a baseball mind in a rash move.  And that move is giving many of us a rash.






Bomber, the important thing to remember is the posting fee for Darvish doesn't count against the team's payroll. that $51 million essentially becomes a moot point when you consider the Steinbrenners make more than that while they are on the crapper.




You're right that posting fee is not going against the payroll budget, but it sure as hell isn't coming out of petty cash either.  It has to come from somewhere.  I really think if they weren't burnt so badly with Igawa they may have taken a chance on Darvish.  With the Yankees luck though the guy would have blown his arm out too.

"Never seen a payroll on a ring"              "Leave the gun,  take the cannoli "
Photobucket
1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 7:20PM #79
qwik3457bb
Posts: 5,751

Apr 28, 2012 -- 9:45AM, 61in61 wrote:


Apr 27, 2012 -- 8:16PM, qwik3457bb wrote:


Apr 26, 2012 -- 2:50PM, 61in61 wrote:


Apr 26, 2012 -- 2:19PM, kingj wrote:


A day after the news re: Pineda, I think the most logical explanation is this: there was a slight, undetectable tear (or something else wrong) that Seattle didn't know about and therefore wasn't trying to pedal us "damaged goods."  I do think, however, that common sense saw a guy who'se production serioulsly dipped, had a big innings increase, which probably led to some "concern."  When Cashman called (or was called), he did his due dilligence, but for whatever reason, eighter didn't see the red flags or felt comfortable with the doctor's exam to make the trade.  In retrospect, those flags are now glaring.  I was so-so about the trade to begin with, not because I didn't think the Yanks should trade Montero but becasue I would've preferred a more established pitcher than someone who had one good half and then dropped off.  Any trade is a chance, I know, but I wasn't thrilled with this one.  Can't complain now because Pineda is injured, which would only serve to reinforce the obvious.  Unfortunately for Cashman, this is yet another pitcher who doesn't appear to be working out (*note: I said "appear."  Pineda could come back in the second half of '13 and be lights out.  Put me in the camp, though, as not believing that will be the case).  Given his Cashman's history of suspect pitching moves, he is going to be questioned, right or wrong.




The Yanks have had a habit the last few years of paying big money for pitchers who have had one or two good seasons. Pavano had one good season with Florida, Burnett with Toronto, Vazquez and Farnsworth with Atlanta. Paul Quantrill is another pitcher who was doing great with the Dodgers in 2003 and came over to the Yanks and bombed.




Actually, Quantrill was great for the Yanks in 2004 until Torre burned him out.




It wasn't just Torre who burned him out. Quantrill led the league in games for 4 consecutive years. Like Feliciano they should have known he was overworked. For whatever reason,he was gone after 1+ season.




No, it was Torre.


By mid-August, he had thrown 75 innings, which was about as many as he had thrown the previous two season, in spite of pitching over 80 games the previous two years. Quantrill was using to less than an inning per appeareance, and Torre, in effect, increased his inning/pitch count by about 35%.

Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber
1 year ago  ::  Apr 28, 2012 - 8:02PM #80
JoeGNJ
Posts: 9,595

Apr 28, 2012 -- 11:03AM, 61in61 wrote:


Cashman should be fired. He screwed up.




As with many topics, youre outta your mind!

JoeGNJ
Page 8 of 11  •  Prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum