YES Network.com

MLB NBA
MLB NBA
 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 7 of 10  •  Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Who killed Bin Laden?
2 years ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 3:18PM #61
GottaGoToMo
Posts: 39,979

May 6, 2012 -- 2:52PM, Yankee1954 wrote:


May 4, 2012 -- 6:53AM, GottaGoToMo wrote:


May 3, 2012 -- 9:14PM, craner7 wrote:


OMG OMG OH MY GOOD GOD......The punk has been given credit over and freeking over again!!!!



The ISSUE is how he is handling it! The ISSUE is the UNPRESIDENTIAL way he is USING this....as HIS freeking victory.



AGAIN.....YEARS...Greeking YEARS of hard work by OTHERS went into this moment being possible. When presented with the monster on a silver platter he took it. THANK YOU oh freeking great one!! But you don't use an AMERICAN victory as a PERSONAL award for political points! It's UNPRESIDENTIAL and in the words of the leftist Huffington....Despicable.



Banging my head against the wall!!




You're right Craner, using it as a political ploy at this point in time is despicable ... but anyone saying in the thread that he doesn't get credit for the initial kill is dead wrong ... he gets that credit ... however, you are right that he is now using it in a despicable manner to gain political points.




 He no more is using bin Laden as a political ploy as anyone else would have. remember the Bush years, they showed Sadaam's hanging on TV. And lets not forget the end to the Iraq war on the Lincoln. And who flew in with a pilot's suit onto the aircraft? Are you kidding, that was granddstanding. According to all Americans was the worst since Hitlet but now that we got him Obama should get no credit. Please tell of of a POTUS who fired a gun as POTUS in a war. No One so enough of the bin Laden talk.




Oh, I agree ... that grandstanding that Bush did on the aircraft carrier was simply ridiculous!

mariano42



"Without the Lord, I cannot do it."  Mariano Rivera - 9/22/13

2 years ago  ::  May 07, 2012 - 3:26PM #62
luvdayanks
Posts: 14,906

May 6, 2012 -- 12:47AM, cywhitey wrote:


LuvDa, do you do anything besides post chain e-mails and doctored videos? The Obama "quotes" are all made up. Obama is the one who made the decision to do the raid. If it would have gone badly, he would have been blamed. Carter was blamed when a similar raid failed. Bush was given credit for any military successes on his watch.


www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/stateme...




To answer your question, I do a lot more, but this is more fun watching the looney left going bonkers and twisting things their way. Of course the quotes are all made up, you just said so.

2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 2:49AM #63
craner7
Posts: 15,484

And I love you down here doing it Luvda!

2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 10:42AM #64
JoeGNJ
Posts: 12,759

As this thread develops, here's an interesting link.  www.theblaze.com/stories/former-attorney...


Former Attorney General Mukasey: ‘Highly Lawyered’ Memo Would Have Blamed Failed OBL Raid on Navy Admiral


Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey told Fox News’ Sean Hannity Monday that, if the Osama bin Laden raid were to fail, a “highly lawyered” memo would see to it that the blame fell squarely on the shoulders of Navy Admiral William McRaven, the commander of Joint Special Operations Command at the time of the raid.



....clearly, POTUS cant do a single thing w/o thrusting politics into it. He's ready to stand up and take a bow, when he wants credit, but nver willing to take any blame.  What a terrible character trait. No wonder kids today fail to take personal responsibility when even the POTUS cant set a decent example.

JoeGNJ
2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 11:17AM #65
jorgecostanza
Posts: 1,362

May 4, 2012 -- 11:03AM, craner7 wrote:


He blew it Max. I know its tough to admit but his arrogance and love of self took over and he screwed up the 1st anniversary of the AMERICAN victory.Tongue Out




There wouldn't even BE an anniversary without Obama...

2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 11:25AM #66
jorgecostanza
Posts: 1,362

May 4, 2012 -- 2:01PM, ArtVandelay wrote:


May 3, 2012 -- 9:53PM, jorgecostanza wrote:


May 3, 2012 -- 9:33PM, craner7 wrote:


....I swear his hypnotizing is pretty strong. God help us.





You mean when bush and his friends convinced you there were wmds in Iraq?






"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998


"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998


"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998


"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998


"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998


"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999


"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002


"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002


"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002


"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002


"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002


"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003






You keep producing these silly quotes that are either 5 years earlier than bush's crusade, or based on bush's falsified intelligence info; either way thanks for making the point of the thread for us, that it's the PRESIDENT who's responsible; in this case bush for the debacle in Iraq and Obama for his KILLING OF BIN LADEN.

2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 11:25AM #67
luvdayanks
Posts: 14,906

May 8, 2012 -- 11:17AM, jorgecostanza wrote:


May 4, 2012 -- 11:03AM, craner7 wrote:


He blew it Max. I know its tough to admit but his arrogance and love of self took over and he screwed up the 1st anniversary of the AMERICAN victory.Tongue Out




There wouldn't even BE an anniversary without Obama...




Now that statement alone shows what a biased fool you are. You're saying that if someone else were in office and had the same intelligence they wouldn't have done the same thing? Really? 

2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 11:38AM #68
jorgecostanza
Posts: 1,362

May 8, 2012 -- 11:25AM, luvdayanks wrote:


May 8, 2012 -- 11:17AM, jorgecostanza wrote:


May 4, 2012 -- 11:03AM, craner7 wrote:


He blew it Max. I know its tough to admit but his arrogance and love of self took over and he screwed up the 1st anniversary of the AMERICAN victory.Tongue Out




There wouldn't even BE an anniversary without Obama...




Now that statement alone shows what a biased fool you are. You're saying that if someone else were in office and had the same intelligence they wouldn't have done the same thing? Really? 




Too bad you had to get personal; I don't recall disrespecting you anywhere here.


Obama said in his campaign that if he felt reason Bin Laden was in Pakistan, he would do whatever it took to take him out, including using our troops. These remarks were blasted down here by all the cons who in effect said he didn't know what he was talking about. Even our biggest hawk McCain never went that far, much less that weak-kneed candy-girl romney.


We got the intelligence because Obama was proactive in gathering it, and got the kill because he alone wouldn't trust the Pakistanis with it.

2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 11:46AM #69
JoeGNJ
Posts: 12,759

May 8, 2012 -- 11:25AM, jorgecostanza wrote:


May 4, 2012 -- 2:01PM, ArtVandelay wrote:


May 3, 2012 -- 9:53PM, jorgecostanza wrote:


May 3, 2012 -- 9:33PM, craner7 wrote:


....I swear his hypnotizing is pretty strong. God help us.





You mean when bush and his friends convinced you there were wmds in Iraq?






"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998


"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998


"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998


"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998


"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998


"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999


"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002


"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002


"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002


"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002


"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002


"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003






You keep producing these silly quotes that are either 5 years earlier than bush's crusade, or based on bush's falsified intelligence info; either way thanks for making the point of the thread for us, that it's the PRESIDENT who's responsible; in this case bush for the debacle in Iraq and Obama for his KILLING OF BIN LADEN.




What are you ILLITERATE? Those aren't Silly" quotes, they're REAL! That's why left=loons!

JoeGNJ
2 years ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 11:56AM #70
jorgecostanza
Posts: 1,362

What are you ILLITERATE? Those aren't Silly" quotes, they're REAL! That's why left=loons!


In this case, silly means useless. Many were from 1998 and thus irrelevant, and the others, as stated, were based on bushie's tricky "intelligence."


The UN inspected at the last minute, told bush not to go, but his small mind was already made up; too bad for 4400 troops and their families...

Page 7 of 10  •  Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum