YES Network.com

Not sure what is so funny Dave.

Just like a Jew cannot eat pork (same for muslims), these are direct teachings. 

Hope you're not Catholic..

May 10, 2012 -- 11:08PM, Yankee1954 wrote:

May 10, 2012 -- 5:58PM, T15D23 wrote:

Catholics cannot vote for anyone that pushes laws against their faith. 

The so-called "open-minded" are nothing more than disobedient Catholics.

But,no, as a Catholic, we cannot vote for someone who is for abortion, promoting homosexual preferences, contraception, etc. 

May 10, 2012 -- 1:41PM, Yankee1954 wrote:

May 10, 2012 -- 12:18PM, GottaGoToMo wrote:

May 10, 2012 -- 9:21AM, JoeGNJ wrote:

Yep, youre FINALLY right Davey Pie. There goes the flip flop tille, as a campaign issue that you lefties pegged Romney with. Thanks POTUS for taking a willful swig from the bottle of re-election poison. . Absolutuely NO reason at all for him to do that. His re-election campaign didnt need it in the least.

Well Joe, God knows he lost a lot of the Catholic vote ... he needs someone to vote for him! 

I am not too sure about that. The ones that don't vote for Obama wouldn't have anuway. And not al Catholics are so narrow minded as you, they look at everything, not just one issue.

BWAHAHAHAHA 

May 11, 2012 -- 12:18AM, T15D23 wrote:

Look my less than stealth socialist friend.

Gays are not denied any rights. They are seeking a right bestowed upon them. A right that is not a right. And certainly nothing that has ever been normalized in all our time on this earth. So give it a break.

And can you tell me what right a bi-sexual needs? Really, give me a break.

And your insance conjecture that Reagan and W made you poor, please. Tell me what you call Carter and Obama? Outright thieves.

May 10, 2012 -- 10:09PM, MajorYankFan wrote:

It is truly amazing how bigots have millions

of defective reasons to justify their bigotry.

Gays are entitled to the same rights as others.

Disobedient Catholics supported Reagan and W

even though both of them promoted poverty

and social injustice.

I guess I am a socialist if it means I think everyone should have the same rights. Sorry! So, if a gay couple goes to a justice of the peace in Ohio and asks him/her to marry them the JOP will marry them? Is that correct? Because they should have the same rights as every other law abiding citizen.

Then how do you handle a bisexual who wants to marry one from each sex? Or why can't one man be married to 3 women (like Obama's daddy did)? Where are their rights? How dare we prevent these persons to have some imagined "right."

Gays, 3 eyed people, obese people, etc. all have the same rights.  

And the government cannot grant us rights. They cannot grant rights where no such right exists. They can only take away rights. There is no right to marriage for anyone. And this goes beyond what exactly is a gay marriage.

This is all distraction. 

Lets talk how great the economy is. How bright the future of America currently is.

Gays, condoms, etc. all about not talking about how bad things are.

May 11, 2012 -- 9:41AM, Yankee1954 wrote:

May 11, 2012 -- 12:18AM, T15D23 wrote:

Look my less than stealth socialist friend.

Gays are not denied any rights. They are seeking a right bestowed upon them. A right that is not a right. And certainly nothing that has ever been normalized in all our time on this earth. So give it a break.

And can you tell me what right a bi-sexual needs? Really, give me a break.

And your insance conjecture that Reagan and W made you poor, please. Tell me what you call Carter and Obama? Outright thieves.

May 10, 2012 -- 10:09PM, MajorYankFan wrote:

It is truly amazing how bigots have millions

of defective reasons to justify their bigotry.

Gays are entitled to the same rights as others.

Disobedient Catholics supported Reagan and W

even though both of them promoted poverty

and social injustice.

I guess I am a socialist if it means I think everyone should have the same rights. Sorry! So, if a gay couple goes to a justice of the peace in Ohio and asks him/her to marry them the JOP will marry them? Is that correct? Because they should have the same rights as every other law abiding citizen.

Call it a domestic partnership, civil union or some other name but not marriage.

May 11, 2012 -- 11:47AM, ldantoni84 wrote:

GOD IS SMILING TODAY?  You CAN'T BE SERIOUS! Try to remember the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.

I, for the life of me, do not understand how ANYONE could believe that being Gay is what God intended.  He created Adam.. and then provided Adam with a wife:  EVE.  Not Steve.  But, let me try this explanation of why it was never intended and why it is not right.

Biology is the enemy to being gay.  So, let's do this:  Let's take 200 gay people:  100 males and 100 females.  Let's put them on separate islands and they must go by gender (of course they're gay, right? So that's what they would want - is to be with their partners).  On these 2  islands, each can have all gay rights they want.. marriage, benefits, insurance, tax deductions.. etc.   HOWEVER.. under no circumstances does a member of the opposite sex go to the island of the other.  All gay population must stay on their own gay island with members of their same sex.

Let them stay there for 200 years.  We come back to collect them.  Those that have survived can come back to the U.S. and we will give them all the rights to marriage that they want.

Summation:  God asked that people be fruitful and multiply.. that takes a male and a female.  God did not intend for mankind to be gay.  Sorry.. He is not smiling on this topic. 

Well stated ld!!

How have you been!  Family well?