YES Network.com

MLB NBA
MLB NBA
 
Network Forums Sport of Politics President Obama Announces Support For Gay Marriage
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 6 of 35  •  Prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35 Next
President Obama Announces Support For Gay Marriage
1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:30PM #51
22yankees22
Posts: 329

May 11, 2012 -- 1:15PM, ldantoni84 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 1:13PM, 22yankees22 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 12:56PM, ldantoni84 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 12:45PM, 22yankees22 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 12:38PM, ldantoni84 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 12:36PM, 22yankees22 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 12:32PM, ldantoni84 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 12:26PM, 22yankees22 wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 11:47AM, ldantoni84 wrote:




  Let's take 200 gay people:  100 males and 100 females.  Let's put them on separate islands and they must go by gender (of course they're gay, right? So that's what they would want - is to be with their partners).  On these 2  islands, each can have all gay rights they want.. marriage, benefits, insurance, tax deductions.. etc.   HOWEVER.. under no circumstances does a member of the opposite sex go to the island of the other.  All gay population must stay on their own gay island with members of their same sex.


Let them stay there for 200 years.  We come back to collect them.  Those that have survived can come back to the U.S. and we will give them all the rights to marriage that they want.


Summation:  God asked that people be fruitful and multiply.. that takes a male and a female.  God did not intend for mankind to be gay.  Sorry.. He is not smiling on this topic. 





Okay....so those 200 gay people won't reproduce and those islands won't be populated after 200 years.  


But gay people will STILL exist in the rest of the world as gay babies are born to HETERO BREEDERS!!  MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA !!!!


ITS THE HETEROS THAT INCREASE THE GAY POPULATION, NOT GAY PEOPLE! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAA.  


Every. LAST. Gay person.  Every single one.  Is the result of a sperm and an egg coming together and producing a gay baby.  


What is your brilliant (read ignorant) solution to the fact that hetero parents produce gay babies?  You can't stop it!  I occurs naturally in the nature of breeding!!!!





Thank you for your reflection.  I do not happen to share your opinion. 








Its not my opinion that my parents are hetero, it is a fact.  I know people like you prefer to ignore facts.  Ignore is the root word of ignorance and you mamam are willfully ignorant.  




Your parents are hetero.  On that we agree.  LOL..


Now, what's your point, other than obviously to throw out insults?  I did not insult you.  I would appreciate your refraining from doing such to me.  Thanks!





For the record, it is insulting for uniformed people to talk about issues that gay americans face in this country.  I didn't mean to insult you, I was pointing out that ignoring information makes you ingnorant.  Its your choice to do so or not.  Perhaps you should look within your ownself to determine why you are offended that your willful ignoring of facts is offesnsive to you.  



I know a lot of gay peoole and 100% of their parnts are hetero.  And 100% of the offspring of my gay friends....is hetero.  




Did you say that your gay friends have offspring?  That is not making any biological sense.




I can imagine that the fact that gay people are not sterile wouldn't make sense to people who willfully ignore facts.  


But since you asked....gay people are capable of child bearing and rearing for that matter.   Yup, gay people can and do have babies. 




Are you intentionally BEING OBTUSE?  NOT WITH EACH OTHER THEY DON'T!!!


Two women, have (some sort of) sexual encounter and actually get pregnant from that interaction?  IS that your position here?




 


Have you heard of surrogacy, IVF or adoption?  I am sure you have.  A better question is...are you this baffled by these things when hetero couples who are in fact sterile utilize them?   Just wondering.  


You seem to be very hung up on gay people having children.  Its a bit weird.  



Edit....I forgot sperm donation.  there is that too.  

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:32PM #52
MADMAX
Posts: 5,835

May 10, 2012 -- 5:58PM, T15D23 wrote:


Catholics cannot vote for anyone that pushes laws against their faith. 


The so-called "open-minded" are nothing more than disobedient Catholics.


But,no, as a Catholic, we cannot vote for someone who is for abortion, promoting homosexual preferences, contraception, etc. 



 




I wouldn't speak for all Catholics. A lot like myself look at who's cutting programs for the poor. Jesus never addressed abortion, contraception. But he did address looking out for the sick, elderly, and the poor. In fact he preached about helping those who can't help themselves the most. You don't have to take my word for it. It's all in the New Testament.

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:36PM #53
GottaGoToMo
Posts: 33,278

May 11, 2012 -- 11:47AM, ldantoni84 wrote:



GOD IS SMILING TODAY?  You CAN'T BE SERIOUS! Try to remember the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.


I, for the life of me, do not understand how ANYONE could believe that being Gay is what God intended.  He created Adam.. and then provided Adam with a wife:  EVE.  Not Steve.  But, let me try this explanation of why it was never intended and why it is not right.


Biology is the enemy to being gay.  So, let's do this:  Let's take 200 gay people:  100 males and 100 females.  Let's put them on separate islands and they must go by gender (of course they're gay, right? So that's what they would want - is to be with their partners).  On these 2  islands, each can have all gay rights they want.. marriage, benefits, insurance, tax deductions.. etc.   HOWEVER.. under no circumstances does a member of the opposite sex go to the island of the other.  All gay population must stay on their own gay island with members of their same sex.


Let them stay there for 200 years.  We come back to collect them.  Those that have survived can come back to the U.S. and we will give them all the rights to marriage that they want.


Summation:  God asked that people be fruitful and multiply.. that takes a male and a female.  God did not intend for mankind to be gay.  Sorry.. He is not smiling on this topic. 









mariano42

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:36PM #54
Boardroomjimmy aka Mr. Meebo
Posts: 3,297

May 11, 2012 -- 1:15PM, ldantoni84 wrote:



Two women, have (some sort of) sexual encounter 





pictures please

B HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:36PM #55
MADMAX
Posts: 5,835

May 11, 2012 -- 1:16PM, ArtVandelay wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 1:15PM, ldantoni84 wrote:


Are you intentionally BEING OBTUSE?  NOT WITH EACH OTHER THEY DON'T!!!


Two women, have (some sort of) sexual encounter and actually get pregnant from that interaction?  IS that your position here?




these folks love to kill the unborn but they have no problem making these babies in labs...




The other side of the coin is that some folks have no problem with people living in poverty, starving. Being truly pro life goes further than getting a child born.

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:36PM #56
ArtVandelay
Posts: 10,092

May 11, 2012 -- 1:32PM, MADMAX wrote:


May 10, 2012 -- 5:58PM, T15D23 wrote:


Catholics cannot vote for anyone that pushes laws against their faith. 


The so-called "open-minded" are nothing more than disobedient Catholics.


But,no, as a Catholic, we cannot vote for someone who is for abortion, promoting homosexual preferences, contraception, etc. 



 




I wouldn't speak for all Catholics. A lot like myself look at who's cutting programs for the poor. Jesus never addressed abortion, contraception. But he did address looking out for the sick, elderly, and the poor. In fact he preached about helping those who can't help themselves the most. You don't have to take my word for it. It's all in the New Testament.




and he said for YOU, the individual, to do those things - you want the government to do them for you...

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:38PM #57
MADMAX
Posts: 5,835

May 11, 2012 -- 1:36PM, Boardroomjimmy aka Mr. Meebo wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 1:15PM, ldantoni84 wrote:



Two women, have (some sort of) sexual encounter 





pictures please





LOL!

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:40PM #58
MADMAX
Posts: 5,835

May 11, 2012 -- 1:36PM, ArtVandelay wrote:


May 11, 2012 -- 1:32PM, MADMAX wrote:


May 10, 2012 -- 5:58PM, T15D23 wrote:


Catholics cannot vote for anyone that pushes laws against their faith. 


The so-called "open-minded" are nothing more than disobedient Catholics.


But,no, as a Catholic, we cannot vote for someone who is for abortion, promoting homosexual preferences, contraception, etc. 



 




I wouldn't speak for all Catholics. A lot like myself look at who's cutting programs for the poor. Jesus never addressed abortion, contraception. But he did address looking out for the sick, elderly, and the poor. In fact he preached about helping those who can't help themselves the most. You don't have to take my word for it. It's all in the New Testament.




and he said for YOU, the individual, to do those things - you want the government to do them for you...





I do donate. But if the govt can help those in need I see nothing wrong with it. The govt has more resources than I do.

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:44PM #59
ArtVandelay
Posts: 10,092

May 11, 2012 -- 1:40PM, MADMAX wrote:


I do donate. But if the govt can help those in need I see nothing wrong with it. The govt has more resources than I do.




my god max, you're a reasonable person - I know you know how the government pisses away OUR money!  How in your right mind can you trust them to run ANYTHING!!!!?????  we the people need to treat our government like a crack addicted kid, we'll only give them enough for the basics and until they clean themselves up and prove they can handle the money we give them we will take care of things OURSELVES - this is not the government of the people, and it won't change this election or the next 100 elections until we throw EVERYONE out and start over!

1 year ago  ::  May 11, 2012 - 1:45PM #60
prof. quiz
Posts: 2,820

May 11, 2012 -- 11:31AM, JoeGNJ wrote:


Absolutely NOT true UNLESS they werent covered  as domestic partners togther before the loss.



Thanks Joe, I didn't realize insurance companies recognized domestic partnerships.




 

Page 6 of 35  •  Prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35 Next
Jump Menu:
 
Network Forums Sport of Politics President Obama Announces Support For Gay Marriage
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum