Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 9 of 9  •  Prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Why won't Pelosi open an inquiry?
4 months ago  ::  Oct 18, 2019 - 11:35AM #81
SSBob643
Posts: 2,193

Oct 18, 2019 -- 11:21AM, Max wrote:


Anyone here notice that the witnesses that are testifying are corroborating what the whistleblower said?




~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The whistleblower's complaint was corroborated simply by the release of the (redacted) phone call transcript. 


4 months ago  ::  Oct 18, 2019 - 12:22PM #82
Max
Posts: 3,549

Oct 18, 2019 -- 11:35AM, SSBob643 wrote:


Oct 18, 2019 -- 11:21AM, Max wrote:


Anyone here notice that the witnesses that are testifying are corroborating what the whistleblower said?




~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The whistleblower's complaint was corroborated simply by the release of the (redacted) phone call transcript. 





Yep, that too.

4 months ago  ::  Oct 18, 2019 - 4:52PM #83
bertram
Posts: 10,777

Mulvaney snatches the media spotlight from Rudy G. with a bold admission of the quid pro quo charge directed at Trump.  Mick is not gonna play second fiddle any longer!

4 months ago  ::  Oct 19, 2019 - 12:48AM #84
NW
Posts: 1,545

Oct 18, 2019 -- 4:52PM, bertram wrote:


Mulvaney snatches the media spotlight from Rudy G. with a bold admission of the quid pro quo charge directed at Trump.  Mick is not gonna play second fiddle any longer!




MULVANEY: Yeah. No, the money held up had absolutely nothing to do with Biden. There’s no — and that was the point I made to you.


QUESTION: — And you’re drawing the distinction? You’re saying that it would be wrong to hold up money for the Bidens —


MULVANEY: — There were three — three factors. Again — I was involved with the — the process by which the money was held up temporarily, okay? Three issues for that: the corruption in the country, whether or not other countries were participating in the support of the Ukraine, and whether or not they were cooperating in an ongoing investigation with our Department of Justice. That’s completely legitimate.


Ooops.  His words back up Trump substantially.  Now, how about quid pro Joe using his influence for personal gain?

Page 9 of 9  •  Prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum