This past offseason has seen many veterans leave the team in favor for younger, more athletic and more affordable players in their prime. Although, there have been several propsed lineups, none have produced a functional #5/A-Rod protector for my tastes. In my mind, the answer has been clear ever since we got the athletic, speed C-Grand and was re-assured even more with the Nick Johnsons signing. The only true hitter capable of certifying back-up whenever Alexander steps to the plate is none other but Mark Texiera!
Now, some might be puzzled, others angry but please hear out my idea before disapproving it fully in your pinstripe hearts. My first reason for my proposed switch for Mark is the fact that his hitter type in my opinion tends to lean more towards run producer than the overal balance hitter prefered for the #3 spot.After a year of watching Tex in pinstripes I have come to judge him as a hitter who accelerates in RBI moments rather than simpling looking to get on-base.
Simply put, I believe Teixera is an aggressive slugger looking for RBI's not a passive hitter who jut so happens to have power to go-along with his incredible On-Base acumen. Although, both had uppercut swings- Tino Martinez's & Jason Giambi' skill differd greatly and I tend to believe Mark has more Tino in him than Jason.
Don't get me wrong, an MVP season full of clutch hits and glowing statistics shows he more than capable of being there for many years to come, but if Brian Cashman refuses to move the budget to sign a Matt Holiday, what choice is better than Tex? Time in the majors has allowed Jorge Posada to improve his pitch recognition greatly, but it has also drained his bat speed & power to the point where placing him behind an elite hitter, A-ROD, has turned into an improbale decision. Plus, another negative to that idea is the glaring fact of Robinson Cano being a vastly better hitter at this point and if he can't surpass Jorge at this point- then it is indeed time to worry about his future. So, a potential Grandy for righties, Cano for lefties platoon and Jorge being the constant #6 hitter is a tolerable solution, but still not close to the envisioned lineup I had in mind.
Still, you fine ladies and gents are wondering who the heck replaces Mark's 2009 spot at the #3 hole? Well, to be fair I didn't know until we recently signed him, this individual does everything you want from a #3 hitter- he has perhaps the best eye to recognize pitches and get on-base in a remarkable clip. He knows how to hit well for average to all fields and loves torturing pitches with long at-bats that would make the in his prime-Oakland Atheletic Giambino proud. Of course, you probable guessed with the such key words that I'm refering to Nick Johnson.
I know how everyone thinks the best and/or only spot he has in this powerful lineup is the #2 hole but why is that? In my opinion, the first two guys in most great lineups are speedy atheletic hitters who have long at-bats and know how to get on base no matter what. While, Nick fits the latter description nicely, the former description is much harder for Nick to comply with his skill set. Plus, I think placing him in the #2 spot will lead to way too many double plays due to his lack of speed plus I do believe we have a far better option with...wait for it..... Curtis Granderson.
Quickly, side note, I have just loved the judgement this all-star has already recieved from the Yankee faithful. The idea his few problems {against lefties; strikeouts too much} are permenant problems to his game are foolish and incorrect notions. Even with the problems, the Detroit star had a certified MVP season three years ago and a very good season two years ago and I believe he would eaily match Johnny's numbers from the number two hole.
The only thing we worry about placing him in Johnny's old spot is the fear he will not battle pitchers as well because of his high strikeout numbers and his struggles against lefties. First, let me address the latter prospect because I realize if he never overcomes his problem against lefties then we have no choice and keep him in the latter part the order. Still, I firmly believe giving him the chance to keep his career major league spot in the top of the order and if he succeeds in at least overcoming the problem against lefties then we have a superior offensive weapon than Damon. Finally, let us not forget the guy has succeeded in the top of the order and has been one of the few bright spots in the abysmal Detroit lineup over the last few years.
Also, I believe the best combo for the top of order is pairing Derek with Curtis instead of limiting run production by having the slower Johnson be in the #2 spot. Also, trying this combo out would be financially smart because if it worked it would remove the need for getting Carl Crawford next year. Personally, I believe we will be after Carl Crawford over a Holliday, even Werth and Hawrpe next offseason because he could best replace the combo we had with Derek-Johnny. Still, I think Curtis is superior overall player than Carl (especially defensively) and he could easily be our #2 hitter for years to come- if only he solves that {vs. lefties} problem. Oh, as for his strikeout problem, another guy has a similar strikeout problem and his offense has translate well in the top of the order, as well. That guy's name is uh, Derek Jeter.
Now, I know Derek's problem with strikeouts has never been as severe, still if Curtis can't lower his strikeout rate from the ugly 140's to the preferable 90's-100's per year then I will be greatly dissapointed. I have no proof that he will indeed strikeout less or suddenly figure out southpaws, but I do believe that being surrounded in the best lineup in the sport, instant career re-vitalization coming from depressive Detroit (last three season have been brutal since WS appearence in 06) to the elated clubhouse in the Bronx and having one of the better hitting coach, Kevin Long, will greatly improve his already fine offensive game.
Then, I have always figure the best place for Nick to bat in the lineup is the three hole because it would be ideal to have one of the best On-Base% guys bat ahead of our best run producer-Alex Rodriguez. Imagine having a guy who easily gets on-base at a 40% clip, forces the pitcher to throws a ton, will not be tempted by the short porch to become a strict pull hitter- he is a balanced hitter and of course he will benefit from batting ahead of Alex, too. All this could allow Nick to post his most impressive numbers in his career easily.
I know the Universe will be howling at me for removing the power threat of Teix-Alex that produced a WS championship & was the best 1-2 punch in the game. Still, I think that tandem was formed mainly due to the threat Alex brings and folks forget (ya, know with the injuries) Nick is an elite On-Base & very balanced hitter- for me that translates into a John Orleud-lite player. If this guy's healthy, I believe he can be a better #3 hitter than Teixera, who I think translates better in the cleanup role or the runnerup cleanup role- the #5 spot. So, in conclusion, my 2010 New York Yankee lineup would be:
Finally, I wish to provoke your minds, MyYes community, to the greatest reason why I want this line-up to come to life and that point is- fufillment. I believe if we allow Nick to bat in the number two slot % Curtis somewhere in a more RBI focused lower slot in the lineup; it will prevent them to fix their problems and allow the team to accept their limitations- which is never good for a team that last year famously believed- no lead was safe from their inevitable comeback magic.
I will focus on Curtis first because many have already stapled the image of his shortcomings before his first at-bat in Yankee pinstripes and I refuse to allow Curtis to be marginalized into a platoon player. This guy truely can become Bernie's Heir and it won't happen if we bury this All-Star in the bottom of the lineup after a career in the top of the order. Now, onto the solution, shall we Yankee Universe? I think every segment in a baseball lineup focuses on a different aspect of the offensive game and it breaks down like this- top of the order (primary objective- get on base, contact hitters, speed, see plenty of pitches); middle of the order (primary objective- bring runners home, aggressive-patient sluggers); & the bottom of the order (primary objective- hitters who weren't good enough to excel in one of the previous segments)
So where does Curtis fit in this proposition? Many feel he belongs in the bottom of the order and I believe that is true waste of his abilities because his bat would fit nicely Johnny's old spot. Face it, putting Curtis in the #7,8 or 9 slots would allow C-Grand to accept his short-comings and never fufill his true potential- see Nick Swisher's horrific batting average and strikeout problem for an example. Personally, I feel it would be a terrible decision for Curtis because he is on the edge of turning into the wrong type of hitter- a slugger.
In the long run, Curtis projects better as really strong contact hitter rather than an awkward slugger. And the time is now, Girardi and co. to save Granderson from settling into a slugger's persona of not caring about your strike-out-rate, focusing on your slugging% over on-base%, and prehaps even accepting a platoon. Also, I have faith to believe Curtis at his opinion on himself- about being able to do whatever the team asks of him. So, I firmly believe his numbers were altered in Detroit because Curtis knew in that weak lineup he needed to be more of a slugger and produce runs along with scoring them. Here, he can relax in the top of the order because there are plenty of guys to bring him home. In this new top of the order, he can adjust his hitting approach to take more pitches, improve his On-Base% & alter his offensive persona to reflect more a Damon-Jeter style: aggressive/high-on base contact hitting.
Now, you're probably wondering how Nick Johnson offensive can be improve? The only problem he has is Charlie Brown-like luck with injury, right? There, my fellow Pinstripe brothers & sisters is where you would be wrong. Personally, I believe Nick could actually be more aggressive and the thought has come to my mind, what if Nick's great On-Base% is a result from him becoming too passive? Or is he simply an infield version of Bobby Abreu in his prime just waiting to play in an awesome line to excel his full potential? I prefer to believe the latter and I think batting infront of Alex will allow Nick to open up his aggressive side.
Like Granderson shouldering the burden for Detroit's offensive problems, I believe Nick Johnson has been on many teams where he has to focus on his best skill- getting on-base. Thus, between playing on weak offensive teams & battling his injuries, I believe Nick has never been able to explore his full offensive game. If the Yanks decide to place him in the #2 spot, I think Nick will settle into his familar offensive game of having a great on-base, but letting his slugging ability slide. Although, if the Yanks were to place Johnson in the #3 slot, I think Nick will see too many good pitches, batting infront of Alex, not to improve his slugging and run production. Plus, his lack of speed & athleticism, hurts in comparison to what Damon or Curtis could bring to the slot.
1) Curtis Granderson {lefty}
2)Derek Jeter {righty}
3)Nick Johnson {lefty}
4) Alex Rodriguez {righty}
5)Mark Teixera {switch}
6)Robinson Cano {lefty}
7) Jorge Posada {switch}
8)Nick Swisher {switch}
9)Brett Gardner {lefty}
So, please I wish to hear your thoughts and most of all tell me I'm not too crazy for imagining this line-up. I really think it could help utilize C-Grand & Nick Johnson's full potential and solve their offensive problems. Can't wait for the reaction...
[Edited By Moderator]