Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 13  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 Next
Corrupt System
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 2:56PM #11
Max
Posts: 42,830

Sir, I think it’s important that you understand the context in which the texts were made. In terms of the texts that we will stop it. You need to understand that that was written late at night, off-the-cuff and it was in response to a sear Aries of events that included then candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero, and my presumption based on that horrible disgusting behavior that the American population would not elect someone demonstrating that behavior to be president of the United States. It was in no way unequivocally any suggestion that me, the FBI, would take any action whatsoever to improperly impact the electoral process for any candidate. I take great offense and great disagreement to your assertion to what that was or wasn’t.


As for the 100 million to one that was clearly made in jest. I acknowledge that is actually their right. That is what makes our democracy such a vie grant process it is. But to suggest we can parse down the words of shorthand like they’re a contract for a car is simply not consistent with my or most people’s use of text messaging. I can assure you, Mr. Chairman, at no time in any of these texts did those personal beliefs ever enter into the realm of any action I took. Furthermore, this isn’t just me sitting here telling you. You don’t have to take my word for it.


At every step, at every investigative decision, there are multiple layers of people above me and multiple layers of people below me. Agents and analysts. All of whom were involved in these decisions. They would not tolerate any improper behavior in me any more than I would tolerate it in them. That is who we are as the FBI. The suggestion that I in some dark chamber would somehow cast aside all of these procedures and, and somehow be able to do this, safeguards is astounding. The proposition that is going on and might occur in the FBI deeply corrodes what the FBI is and is deeply destructive.


Strzok’s remarks were applauded in the room.

.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:01PM #12
Max
Posts: 42,830

Strzok: Anti-Trump Text Based On His ‘Horrible, Disgusting’ Treatment Of Gold Star Family



talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/strzok-an... via @TPM

.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:28PM #13
yank0428
Posts: 18,446

Jul 12, 2018 -- 2:56PM, Max wrote:


Sir, I think it’s important that you understand the context in which the texts were made. In terms of the texts that we will stop it. You need to understand that that was written late at night, off-the-cuff and it was in response to a sear Aries of events that included then candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero, and my presumption based on that horrible disgusting behavior that the American population would not elect someone demonstrating that behavior to be president of the United States. It was in no way unequivocally any suggestion that me, the FBI, would take any action whatsoever to improperly impact the electoral process for any candidate. I take great offense and great disagreement to your assertion to what that was or wasn’t.


As for the 100 million to one that was clearly made in jest. I acknowledge that is actually their right. That is what makes our democracy such a vie grant process it is. But to suggest we can parse down the words of shorthand like they’re a contract for a car is simply not consistent with my or most people’s use of text messaging. I can assure you, Mr. Chairman, at no time in any of these texts did those personal beliefs ever enter into the realm of any action I took. Furthermore, this isn’t just me sitting here telling you. You don’t have to take my word for it.


At every step, at every investigative decision, there are multiple layers of people above me and multiple layers of people below me. Agents and analysts. All of whom were involved in these decisions. They would not tolerate any improper behavior in me any more than I would tolerate it in them. That is who we are as the FBI. The suggestion that I in some dark chamber would somehow cast aside all of these procedures and, and somehow be able to do this, safeguards is astounding. The proposition that is going on and might occur in the FBI deeply corrodes what the FBI is and is deeply destructive.


Strzok’s remarks were applauded in the room.




Really Max. By who? The Dems who are ignoring his texts and their implications.


 Great prepared comment on Strzoks part. The problem he doesn't seem to realize that nobody is questioning the rank and file. They are questioning the upper levels and how many of them were demoted or fired. That tells you of the bias and wrong doing. He also doesn't seem to realize that the investigation into the handling of the Russia investigation is still undergoing.


He's a good liar. Thats it. Interesting Page is waiting till tomorrow so she can listen and get her story straight. 

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:32PM #14
yank0428
Posts: 18,446

Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:01PM, Max wrote:


Strzok: Anti-Trump Text Based On His ‘Horrible, Disgusting’ Treatment Of Gold Star Family



talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/strzok-an... via @TPM




Yea when did he figure that was a good time to use that as an excuse. Shows his bias right there.


 The IG asked if he could look at his personal phone to see his texts on them that were work related. Strzok said he would  turn over any that were work related. He said he couldn't find any. Sounds like asking Hillary to turn over her emails. They left it at that. Does anybody believe that.Really digging hard there.

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:41PM #15
craner7
Posts: 23,298
It's absolutely INCREDIBLE to me he was allowed to choose what to turn over to the IG. INCREDIBLE!!!!

Maybe I missed it haven't watched all of it but haven't heard anything about his insurance policy
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:43PM #16
craner7
Posts: 23,298
Max yea he was applauded by democrats....they even want to give him the Purple Heart.....no joke.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:44PM #17
MajorYankFan
Posts: 32,868

Peter Strzok just gave a hard-to-rebut defense of the objectivity of the Russia investigation’s origins


“In the summer of 2016,” Strzok wrote, “I was one of a handful of people who knew the details of Russian election interference and its possible connections with members of the Trump campaign. This information had the potential to derail, and quite possibly, defeat Mr. Trump. But the thought of exposing that information never crossed my mind.”


This is a nearly impossible point to rebut.



All we get from con artists is blah, blah, blah this conspiracy, then


blah, blah, blah that conspiracy.  Only conspiracies, but when it


comes to substance.............


Image result for time to take a nap now

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:46PM #18
yank0428
Posts: 18,446

Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:41PM, craner7 wrote:

It's absolutely INCREDIBLE to me he was allowed to choose what to turn over to the IG. INCREDIBLE!!!! Maybe I missed it haven't watched all of it but haven't heard anything about his insurance policy



I want someone to ask why the IT guy who deleated Hillarys emails and in texts they said they knew he was lying. Why was he given immunity and not charged? Who gets away with that? Only someone in an investigation that they don't want to charge with a crime.  

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:54PM #19
craner7
Posts: 23,298
Good question...or why it was ok to destroy I phones and delete subpoenaed emails.

Strozk explanation for smelling Trump supporters was hysterical and pathetic how democrats buy it
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:55PM #20
Max
Posts: 42,830

Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:28PM, yank0428 wrote:


Jul 12, 2018 -- 2:56PM, Max wrote:


Sir, I think it’s important that you understand the context in which the texts were made. In terms of the texts that we will stop it. You need to understand that that was written late at night, off-the-cuff and it was in response to a sear Aries of events that included then candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero, and my presumption based on that horrible disgusting behavior that the American population would not elect someone demonstrating that behavior to be president of the United States. It was in no way unequivocally any suggestion that me, the FBI, would take any action whatsoever to improperly impact the electoral process for any candidate. I take great offense and great disagreement to your assertion to what that was or wasn’t.


As for the 100 million to one that was clearly made in jest. I acknowledge that is actually their right. That is what makes our democracy such a vie grant process it is. But to suggest we can parse down the words of shorthand like they’re a contract for a car is simply not consistent with my or most people’s use of text messaging. I can assure you, Mr. Chairman, at no time in any of these texts did those personal beliefs ever enter into the realm of any action I took. Furthermore, this isn’t just me sitting here telling you. You don’t have to take my word for it.


At every step, at every investigative decision, there are multiple layers of people above me and multiple layers of people below me. Agents and analysts. All of whom were involved in these decisions. They would not tolerate any improper behavior in me any more than I would tolerate it in them. That is who we are as the FBI. The suggestion that I in some dark chamber would somehow cast aside all of these procedures and, and somehow be able to do this, safeguards is astounding. The proposition that is going on and might occur in the FBI deeply corrodes what the FBI is and is deeply destructive.


Strzok’s remarks were applauded in the room.




Really Max. By who? The Dems who are ignoring his texts and their implications.


 Great prepared comment on Strzoks part. The problem he doesn't seem to realize that nobody is questioning the rank and file. They are questioning the upper levels and how many of them were demoted or fired. That tells you of the bias and wrong doing. He also doesn't seem to realize that the investigation into the handling of the Russia investigation is still undergoing.


He's a good liar. Thats it. Interesting Page is waiting till tomorrow so she can listen and get her story straight. 




That's the 2nd time the Page getting her story straight comment was made here. When was the last time we saw simultaneous hearings? 


Cons want to say that they aren't questioning the rank and file. But he clearly pointed out the layers of safeguards that guard against improper behavior that include people above and below him.


He's there to answer questions under oath. What proof do you have right now that he's lying? If he's at a hearing I'm sure he realizes that the investigation into the handling of the Russia investigation is still not complete. 

.
Page 2 of 13  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum