Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 13  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 Next
Corrupt System
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 3:59PM #21
Max
Posts: 42,830

Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:43PM, craner7 wrote:

Max yea he was applauded by democrats....they even want to give him the Purple Heart.....no joke.





Yet the Cons couldn't refute what he said that made him get the applause. 

.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 4:02PM #22
Max
Posts: 42,830

Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:44PM, MajorYankFan wrote:


Peter Strzok just gave a hard-to-rebut defense of the objectivity of the Russia investigation’s origins


“In the summer of 2016,” Strzok wrote, “I was one of a handful of people who knew the details of Russian election interference and its possible connections with members of the Trump campaign. This information had the potential to derail, and quite possibly, defeat Mr. Trump. But the thought of exposing that information never crossed my mind.”


This is a nearly impossible point to rebut.



All we get from con artists is blah, blah, blah this conspiracy, then


blah, blah, blah that conspiracy.  Only conspiracies, but when it


comes to substance.............





EXACTLY! And it's a proven FACT that he didn't release what he knew that could have derailed Trump's campaign. Too bad Comey didn't do that when it came to Hillary.   

.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 4:31PM #23
yank0428
Posts: 18,446

Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:55PM, Max wrote:


Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:28PM, yank0428 wrote:


Jul 12, 2018 -- 2:56PM, Max wrote:


Sir, I think it’s important that you understand the context in which the texts were made. In terms of the texts that we will stop it. You need to understand that that was written late at night, off-the-cuff and it was in response to a sear Aries of events that included then candidate Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero, and my presumption based on that horrible disgusting behavior that the American population would not elect someone demonstrating that behavior to be president of the United States. It was in no way unequivocally any suggestion that me, the FBI, would take any action whatsoever to improperly impact the electoral process for any candidate. I take great offense and great disagreement to your assertion to what that was or wasn’t.


As for the 100 million to one that was clearly made in jest. I acknowledge that is actually their right. That is what makes our democracy such a vie grant process it is. But to suggest we can parse down the words of shorthand like they’re a contract for a car is simply not consistent with my or most people’s use of text messaging. I can assure you, Mr. Chairman, at no time in any of these texts did those personal beliefs ever enter into the realm of any action I took. Furthermore, this isn’t just me sitting here telling you. You don’t have to take my word for it.


At every step, at every investigative decision, there are multiple layers of people above me and multiple layers of people below me. Agents and analysts. All of whom were involved in these decisions. They would not tolerate any improper behavior in me any more than I would tolerate it in them. That is who we are as the FBI. The suggestion that I in some dark chamber would somehow cast aside all of these procedures and, and somehow be able to do this, safeguards is astounding. The proposition that is going on and might occur in the FBI deeply corrodes what the FBI is and is deeply destructive.


Strzok’s remarks were applauded in the room.




Really Max. By who? The Dems who are ignoring his texts and their implications.


 Great prepared comment on Strzoks part. The problem he doesn't seem to realize that nobody is questioning the rank and file. They are questioning the upper levels and how many of them were demoted or fired. That tells you of the bias and wrong doing. He also doesn't seem to realize that the investigation into the handling of the Russia investigation is still undergoing.


He's a good liar. Thats it. Interesting Page is waiting till tomorrow so she can listen and get her story straight. 




That's the 2nd time the Page getting her story straight comment was made here. When was the last time we saw simultaneous hearings? 


Cons want to say that they aren't questioning the rank and file. But he clearly pointed out the layers of safeguards that guard against improper behavior that include people above and below him.


He's there to answer questions under oath. What proof do you have right now that he's lying? If he's at a hearing I'm sure he realizes that the investigation into the handling of the Russia investigation is still not complete. 




She was supposed to testify Wed not today but she defied the subpoena. Why? 


 A lot of people above him were removed from their positions because of their misconduct. This has nothing to do with the rank and file.


 Oh Max please. He's a know liar . Ask his wife.He's no hero but listening to the Dems he is. It's a joke. 

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 4:37PM #24
craner7
Posts: 23,298
Listening to him he's the most dedicated the most honest FBI agent in America. Deserving the Purple Heart according to democrats.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 4:38PM #25
craner7
Posts: 23,298
Now apologizing to him. What a joke.
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 4:42PM #26
yank0428
Posts: 18,446

Jul 12, 2018 -- 4:38PM, craner7 wrote:

Now apologizing to him. What a joke.



The Dems knocking the Republicans. If you watched the beginning you could tell they got together before to disrupt Goodlatte. Interrupting all together but the Republicans are being uncivil. They have been doing it the whole hearing.

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 4:53PM #27
craner7
Posts: 23,298
It's been an orchestrated circus
4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 5:19PM #28
MajorYankFan
Posts: 32,868

Jul 12, 2018 -- 4:02PM, Max wrote:


Jul 12, 2018 -- 3:44PM, MajorYankFan wrote:


Peter Strzok just gave a hard-to-rebut defense of the objectivity of the Russia investigation’s origins


“In the summer of 2016,” Strzok wrote, “I was one of a handful of people who knew the details of Russian election interference and its possible connections with members of the Trump campaign. This information had the potential to derail, and quite possibly, defeat Mr. Trump. But the thought of exposing that information never crossed my mind.”


This is a nearly impossible point to rebut.



All we get from con artists is blah, blah, blah this conspiracy, then


blah, blah, blah that conspiracy.  Only conspiracies, but when it


comes to substance.............




EXACTLY! And it's a proven FACT that he didn't release what he knew that could have derailed Trump's campaign. Too bad Comey didn't do that when it came to Hillary.   




With the con artists, words seem to have greater weight than behavior.


Stzok was bad mouthing a lot of politicians, not just Crooked Donnie.


"The FBI is Trumpland," one current agent reportedly said, adding that Clinton was seen as the "antichrist personified" to many personnel.


Funny how to con artists that everybody is a liar but the biggest liar of


them all: LYING DONNIE.


Trump’s business sought deal on a Trump Tower in Moscow while he ran for president


Trump had the open for business sign out for Russians regarding getting


dirt of Clinton, at the same time promising relief on Russian sanctions.


But the con artists are just in denial about Crooked Donnie.

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 5:36PM #29
yankoldfan
Posts: 12,148

I watched these proceeding all afternoon, both sides threw haymakers but there were no knock out blows in my opinion... In the eyes of the people that support one side or the other is for certain which party you stand for !!


The one question I have to ask is pretty simple, who gives a $hit what was said or not said, who gives a $hit if it was done right or wrong, what people should give a $hhit about is if, when, why the Russians interfered with our elections, and if anyone else was involved ?? Why is one party trying to find that out and the other trying to stop the Mueller investigations from getting to the bottom and the results ??


I only come to one conclusion, and that's one party is afraid of what those findings might be and they are doing everything in their power to stop from getting the answers this country should really and only be interested in finding out....

4 years ago  ::  Jul 12, 2018 - 7:08PM #30
yank0428
Posts: 18,446

Jul 12, 2018 -- 5:36PM, yankoldfan wrote:


I watched these proceeding all afternoon, both sides threw haymakers but there were no knock out blows in my opinion... In the eyes of the people that support one side or the other is for certain which party you stand for !!


The one question I have to ask is pretty simple, who gives a $hit what was said or not said, who gives a $hit if it was done right or wrong, what people should give a $hhit about is if, when, why the Russians interfered with our elections, and if anyone else was involved ?? Why is one party trying to find that out and the other trying to stop the Mueller investigations from getting to the bottom and the results ??


I only come to one conclusion, and that's one party is afraid of what those findings might be and they are doing everything in their power to stop from getting the answers this country should really and only be interested in finding out....




I agree I don't know why the Dems don't want to know when, why and how this investigation started.


Don't you think when Mueller found out about the texts and he called Strzok to tell him he was getting kicked off the investigation because of his texts that Mueller would ask about the Insurance policy in Andys office. What did you mean by we will stop it? Did you do anything in regards to these texts?He didn't ask him about any of the texts. Good investigative skills there Bob.

Page 3 of 13  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum