Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 4 of 274  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 274 Next
Oh Those Crazy, Wacky Con Artists: Part 11
2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:03PM #31
GottaGoToMo
Posts: 84,970

Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




When did they say that?

2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:04PM #32
Max
Posts: 11,072

Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




Who are these people that hate the media? The free press is very important to a free country.


Where is the lie in the headline? The SCOTUS ruled against Trump by not hearing that ridiculous case. 

2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:06PM #33
NW
Posts: 4,784

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:03PM, GottaGoToMo wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




When did they say that?




It was in the letter rejecting the case for lack of standing.  I'm not really sure what it's called; it's not an opinion or judgment but it was the letter explaining rejection of the case.

2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:08PM #34
NW
Posts: 4,784

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:04PM, Max wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




Who are these people that hate the media? The free press is very important to a free country.


Where is the lie in the headline? The SCOTUS ruled against Trump by not hearing that ridiculous case. 




OK, let me put it so you might understand.  First, the SCOTUS can't rule against Trump if Trump doesn't bring a case to the SCOTUS.  Second, the SCOTUS didn't make a ruling on the evidence brought in the case.  They simply said that the State of Texas did not have standing to bring the case as they were not party to the case.

2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:10PM #35
GottaGoToMo
Posts: 84,970

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:06PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:03PM, GottaGoToMo wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




When did they say that?




It was in the letter rejecting the case for lack of standing.  I'm not really sure what it's called; it's not an opinion or judgment but it was the letter explaining rejection of the case.




Link please 


Here is a link to the judgment


www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/...

2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:11PM #36
NY23
Posts: 22,075

Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




The radical right hates the media because it conflicts with their alternate realities. The article is not about the failed attempt of Crackhead Donnie and his sycophants' efforts to overturn the president outcome by bogus contentions, but about the machinations of a far-right extremist: Allen West.


2 years ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:38PM #37
Max
Posts: 11,072

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:08PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:04PM, Max wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




Who are these people that hate the media? The free press is very important to a free country.


Where is the lie in the headline? The SCOTUS ruled against Trump by not hearing that ridiculous case. 




OK, let me put it so you might understand.  First, the SCOTUS can't rule against Trump if Trump doesn't bring a case to the SCOTUS.  Second, the SCOTUS didn't make a ruling on the evidence brought in the case.  They simply said that the State of Texas did not have standing to bring the case as they were not party to the case.




I understand perfectly that on many topics including this one, you don't know what you're talking about. But have fun with your semantics. lol

2 years ago  ::  Dec 13, 2020 - 10:11AM #38
NY23
Posts: 22,075

Well then, there is no need to get a vaccine.


GOP Congressman-Elect Praises Maskless Trump Supporters: ‘This Is A Phony Pandemic’


Bob Good, who is slated to represent Virginia’s 5th Congressional District, praised a crowd of maskless pro-Trump rally-goers as a “group of people that gets it.”

2 years ago  ::  Dec 14, 2020 - 9:08AM #39
bertram
Posts: 18,298

Is there no end to the cacklin' rightie rube parade?

2 years ago  ::  Dec 14, 2020 - 9:19AM #40
NY23
Posts: 22,075

As if she is not an American-hating bigot herself.


Kelly Loeffler Poses With Former KKK Leader, Now Claims She Had No Idea


www.huffpost.com/entry/kelly-loeffler-ch...


Page 4 of 274  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 274 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum