Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 4 of 105  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 105 Next
Oh Those Crazy, Wacky Con Artists: Part 11
11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:03PM #31
GottaGoToMo
Posts: 84,626

Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




When did they say that?

11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:04PM #32
Max
Posts: 8,323

Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




Who are these people that hate the media? The free press is very important to a free country.


Where is the lie in the headline? The SCOTUS ruled against Trump by not hearing that ridiculous case. 

11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:06PM #33
NW
Posts: 3,365

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:03PM, GottaGoToMo wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




When did they say that?




It was in the letter rejecting the case for lack of standing.  I'm not really sure what it's called; it's not an opinion or judgment but it was the letter explaining rejection of the case.

11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:08PM #34
NW
Posts: 3,365

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:04PM, Max wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




Who are these people that hate the media? The free press is very important to a free country.


Where is the lie in the headline? The SCOTUS ruled against Trump by not hearing that ridiculous case. 




OK, let me put it so you might understand.  First, the SCOTUS can't rule against Trump if Trump doesn't bring a case to the SCOTUS.  Second, the SCOTUS didn't make a ruling on the evidence brought in the case.  They simply said that the State of Texas did not have standing to bring the case as they were not party to the case.

11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:10PM #35
GottaGoToMo
Posts: 84,626

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:06PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:03PM, GottaGoToMo wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




When did they say that?




It was in the letter rejecting the case for lack of standing.  I'm not really sure what it's called; it's not an opinion or judgment but it was the letter explaining rejection of the case.




Link please 


Here is a link to the judgment


www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/...

11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:11PM #36
NY23
Posts: 15,917

Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




The radical right hates the media because it conflicts with their alternate realities. The article is not about the failed attempt of Crackhead Donnie and his sycophants' efforts to overturn the president outcome by bogus contentions, but about the machinations of a far-right extremist: Allen West.


11 months ago  ::  Dec 12, 2020 - 4:38PM #37
Max
Posts: 8,323

Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:08PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 4:04PM, Max wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 3:15PM, NW wrote:


Dec 12, 2020 -- 1:01PM, NY23 wrote:


Texas GOP chair calls for SECESSION after SCOTUS rules against Trump












And this is why people hate the media.  Lies in the headlines.  The SCOTUS didn't rule against Trump.  The SCOTUS wasn't even hearing a case brought by Trump AND they didn't even rule on a case.  They found that the State of Texas lacked standing to bring the case to court.  The Court did say that they would prioritize hearing any case brought by someone who had standing related to the election. 




Who are these people that hate the media? The free press is very important to a free country.


Where is the lie in the headline? The SCOTUS ruled against Trump by not hearing that ridiculous case. 




OK, let me put it so you might understand.  First, the SCOTUS can't rule against Trump if Trump doesn't bring a case to the SCOTUS.  Second, the SCOTUS didn't make a ruling on the evidence brought in the case.  They simply said that the State of Texas did not have standing to bring the case as they were not party to the case.




I understand perfectly that on many topics including this one, you don't know what you're talking about. But have fun with your semantics. lol

11 months ago  ::  Dec 13, 2020 - 10:11AM #38
NY23
Posts: 15,917

Well then, there is no need to get a vaccine.


GOP Congressman-Elect Praises Maskless Trump Supporters: ‘This Is A Phony Pandemic’


Bob Good, who is slated to represent Virginia’s 5th Congressional District, praised a crowd of maskless pro-Trump rally-goers as a “group of people that gets it.”

11 months ago  ::  Dec 14, 2020 - 9:08AM #39
bertram
Posts: 15,768

Is there no end to the cacklin' rightie rube parade?

11 months ago  ::  Dec 14, 2020 - 9:19AM #40
NY23
Posts: 15,917

As if she is not an American-hating bigot herself.


Kelly Loeffler Poses With Former KKK Leader, Now Claims She Had No Idea


www.huffpost.com/entry/kelly-loeffler-ch...


Page 4 of 105  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 105 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum