Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Kavanaugh
4 months ago  ::  Jun 24, 2022 - 7:37PM #11
NY23
Posts: 20,951

Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 6:55AM #12
bertram
Posts: 17,776

Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 8:13AM #13
louisiana_lightning
Posts: 22,059

Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 9:13AM #14
NY23
Posts: 20,951

Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




One thing Thomas has in common with you and me, he is no legal expert; he is just an empty-headed right-wing extremist.


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases (msn.com)



Thomas was opening the door to more legal challenges by the radical and American-hating right to take away as many Constitutional protections as possible to those who aren't white, male, faux-Christian, rich, and heterosexual.




4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 11:37AM #15
newinn
Posts: 38,827

Jun 25, 2022 -- 9:13AM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




One thing Thomas has in common with you and me, he is no legal expert; he is just an empty-headed right-wing extremist.


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases (msn.com)



Thomas was opening the door to more legal challenges by the radical and American-hating right to take away as many Constitutional protections as possible to those who aren't white, male, faux-Christian, rich, and heterosexual.







exactly!!!

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 11:42AM #16
louisiana_lightning
Posts: 22,059

Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:37AM, newinn wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 9:13AM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




One thing Thomas has in common with you and me, he is no legal expert; he is just an empty-headed right-wing extremist.


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases (msn.com)



Thomas was opening the door to more legal challenges by the radical and American-hating right to take away as many Constitutional protections as possible to those who aren't white, male, faux-Christian, rich, and heterosexual.







exactly!!!




Because the court is not a super legislature to push through the things congress can't accomplish.  They are there to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of law.

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 1:45PM #17
Max
Posts: 10,654

Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




I read the article that's why I know what you're posting is spin.

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 2:07PM #18
NY23
Posts: 20,951

Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:42AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:37AM, newinn wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 9:13AM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




One thing Thomas has in common with you and me, he is no legal expert; he is just an empty-headed right-wing extremist.


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases (msn.com)



Thomas was opening the door to more legal challenges by the radical and American-hating right to take away as many Constitutional protections as possible to those who aren't white, male, faux-Christian, rich, and heterosexual.







exactly!!!




Because the court is not a super legislature to push through the things congress can't accomplish.  They are there to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of law.




Today's radical right-wing activist judges believe that they are to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of the law as if it is 1822, rather than 2022.

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 2:26PM #19
NW
Posts: 4,355

Jun 25, 2022 -- 2:07PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:42AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:37AM, newinn wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 9:13AM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




One thing Thomas has in common with you and me, he is no legal expert; he is just an empty-headed right-wing extremist.


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases (msn.com)



Thomas was opening the door to more legal challenges by the radical and American-hating right to take away as many Constitutional protections as possible to those who aren't white, male, faux-Christian, rich, and heterosexual.







exactly!!!




Because the court is not a super legislature to push through the things congress can't accomplish.  They are there to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of law.




Today's radical right-wing activist judges believe that they are to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of the law as if it is 1822, rather than 2022.




The SC didn't make a decision of "radical right-wing activist judges".  They overturned a bad decision that was made 50 years ago.  Left-leaning and right-leaning constitutional experts are nearly unanimous in the opinion that Roe was an extremely shaky decision.  In fact, Justice Ginsberg spoke of it often during her speeches, often warning that, without supporting legislation, Roe would likely fall.  Until this point, the SC, even at times with liberal majorities, has made rulings which either chipped away at or were in conflict with Roe.  The only reason such a bad decision as Roe had remained on the books for so long is that many justices, liberal and conservative, felt that fully overturning Roe would have consequences that were more devastating than letting a bad decision stand.  In fact, Roberts' concurring opinion said just that.


Although I consider myself pro-life personally, I am extremely upset with the results of this case.  The end result isn't an abortion ban, but instead an abortion ban for those in the wrong zip code or those without the means to get to a state that allows abortions.  The overturning of Roe has a disparate effect on poor communities.  While that isn't a reason to keep bad case law on the books, the onus now falls upon Congress to create legislation to correct it.  

4 months ago  ::  Jun 25, 2022 - 3:38PM #20
NY23
Posts: 20,951

Jun 25, 2022 -- 2:26PM, NW wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 2:07PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:42AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 11:37AM, newinn wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 9:13AM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 8:13AM, louisiana_lightning wrote:


Jun 25, 2022 -- 6:55AM, bertram wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 7:37PM, NY23 wrote:


Jun 24, 2022 -- 6:56PM, Max wrote:


Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should 'reconsider' rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade


www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-s...




I noticed one item missing from Thomas' right-wing hit list was interracial marriage.




I doubt if Thomas would even recuse himself if one of those cases were brought before the high court...




Did either of you read the article?  The writer specified those things.  Thomas' point was not that those issues were decided incorrectly, it was using the same flawed stretch that made Roe bad law should not stand as the reasoning for other bad law.  They could be overturned or placed on firmer legal standing.




One thing Thomas has in common with you and me, he is no legal expert; he is just an empty-headed right-wing extremist.


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases


Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage ruling, said it's 'quite telling' Clarence Thomas omitted the case that legalized interracial marriage after saying the courts should go after other right to privacy cases (msn.com)



Thomas was opening the door to more legal challenges by the radical and American-hating right to take away as many Constitutional protections as possible to those who aren't white, male, faux-Christian, rich, and heterosexual.







exactly!!!




Because the court is not a super legislature to push through the things congress can't accomplish.  They are there to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of law.




Today's radical right-wing activist judges believe that they are to interpret existing law and the constitutionality of the law as if it is 1822, rather than 2022.




The SC didn't make a decision of "radical right-wing activist judges".  They overturned a bad decision that was made 50 years ago.  Left-leaning and right-leaning constitutional experts are nearly unanimous in the opinion that Roe was an extremely shaky decision.  In fact, Justice Ginsberg spoke of it often during her speeches, often warning that, without supporting legislation, Roe would likely fall.  Until this point, the SC, even at times with liberal majorities, has made rulings which either chipped away at or were in conflict with Roe.  The only reason such a bad decision as Roe had remained on the books for so long is that many justices, liberal and conservative, felt that fully overturning Roe would have consequences that were more devastating than letting a bad decision stand.  In fact, Roberts' concurring opinion said just that.


Although I consider myself pro-life personally, I am extremely upset with the results of this case.  The end result isn't an abortion ban, but instead an abortion ban for those in the wrong zip code or those without the means to get to a state that allows abortions.  The overturning of Roe has a disparate effect on poor communities.  While that isn't a reason to keep bad case law on the books, the onus now falls upon Congress to create legislation to correct it.  




5 right-wing activist SC judges overruled a REAFFIRMED precedent to overturn Roe without a compelling basis to do so.  Now, because of these ignorant judges, a new hornet nest has been created by them without any understanding of the consequences of their juvenile-level decision. 


Page 2 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

Yankees Forum